{"id":66323,"date":"2026-02-13T02:00:56","date_gmt":"2026-02-13T07:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.tradestation.com\/insights\/?p=66323"},"modified":"2026-02-13T10:34:15","modified_gmt":"2026-02-13T15:34:15","slug":"tech-earnings-react","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tradestation.com\/insights\/2026\/02\/13\/tech-earnings-react\/","title":{"rendered":"How Have Tech Stocks Traded Since Earnings?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Most technology companies have reported earnings, and prices are down.<\/p>\n

The headlines began on January 28 when Microsoft (MSFT) and Meta Platforms (META) announced results. MSFT plunged on the news, enduring its sharpest decline since the pandemic. META tried to rally but immediately ran into a wall of sellers, finding itself below where it started.<\/p>\n

Other companies like Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) have been swept lower. That combination of price action has depressed the tech-heavy Nasdaq-100, making it the worst-performing major index since earnings season began.<\/p>\n

At least three major trends seem to be at work in the group.<\/p>\n

First, technology outperformed for years as investors focused on its long-term growth potential. That pushed their valuations above most other sectors, and now they\u2019re starting to normalize.<\/p>\n

Second, investors are worried about data center costs. MSFT reported more capital spending than expected. META also faces higher outlays and Alphabet (GOOGL) is issuing debt to finance construction. Amazon.com (AMZN) fell sharply after saying it would spend $200 billion, about $50 billion more than expected.<\/p>\n

Third, fundamentals are an issue as Wall Street questions both the quality and durability of earnings. MSFT predicted weaker margins and is increasing its reliance on OpenAI — a single unprofitable customer. There are also anxieties about AI cannibalizing businesses like data analytics, consulting and software development.<\/p>\n

Vertical Spread<\/h2>\n

Traders positioning for downside before the reports could have profited as the broader indexes fell. Let\u2019s consider two strategies customers might have used to capitalize on the move.<\/p>\n

First is the bearish debit spread using puts<\/a> on QQQ Trust (QQQ), which tracks the Nasdaq-100. MSFT, AMZN and META are among its biggest holdings.<\/p>\n

A debit spread involves buying calls or puts near the money. These can appreciate from a directional move. (Puts fix the price where a stock can be sold, so they gain value to the downside. Calls set a buying price, so they perform the opposite way.)<\/p>\n

Debit spreads<\/a> also involve selling an equal number of options further from the money. This reduces the overall cost of the position, creating potential leverage from a defined move.<\/p>\n

\"\"

QQQ Trust (QQQ), hourly chart, showing the start of tech earnings.<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n

Bearish put spreads mostly profit from prices falling. Traders can use them to simulate short positions in stocks and ETFs. They\u2019re often used for hedging around big events like earnings or economic news.<\/p>\n

Debit spreads are also called \u201cvertical\u201d spreads because they use different strikes with the same expiration.<\/p>\n

QQQ closed at $633.22 on January 28, immediately before MSFT issued results. A trader might have used monthly options, with contracts expiring next Friday, February 20.<\/p>\n

He or she could have purchased the 620 puts for about $6.65 and sold the 615 puts for $5.30, translating into a cost of $1.35. The position was worth about $3.50 yesterday and could expand to $5 if QQQ remains below $615 at the closing bell today. That could translate into a gain of 270 percent from the underlier moving 2.9 percent.<\/p>\n

Nasdaq Futures<\/h2>\n

Another potential downside trade could have used CME\u2019s E-Mini Nasdaq-100 futures, which track the same underlying index. Traders can go short Nasdaq futures to position for a decline or long to profit from a rally. Futures trade virtually around the clock, letting orders get filled outside normal U.S. hours. (The QQQ spread cited above, on the other hand, can only be transacted between 9:30 a.m. ET and 4 p.m. ET.)<\/p>\n

\"\"

E-Mini Nasdaq-100 futures (@NQ), with four-hour bars, showing the start of tech earnings.<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n

CME\u2019s E-mini Nasdaq-100 futures track the Nasdaq-100 with a value of $20 per point. A trader short one contract will see his or her account increase by $20 every 1 point the index falls. Conversely, they stand to lose $20 each point it rises.<\/p>\n

E-mini Nasdaq-100 futures trade in quarter points, which each having a value of $5.<\/p>\n

The root symbol is NQ. Futures also have expiration months (expressed with a unique letter) and years. The current contract expires in March.<\/p>\n

\u201cH\u201d is the identifier for March, so its symbol is NQH26. (Natural born traders using TradeStation know \u201c@NQ\u201d tracks previous contracts historically over time, giving continuous price data for years into the past.)<\/p>\n

NQH26 traded for 26,149.50 shortly before MSFT announced results on January 28. It\u2019s mostly trended lower and closed at 24,822 yesterday. A single short contract would have gained about $26,550. (See our margin requirements<\/a> page for more.)<\/p>\n

What\u2019s Next for Tech?<\/h2>\n

Two more key technology companies have yet to report earnings:<\/p>\n